For those of you who know me well …or have joined me for a Chief Wine Officer event …you’ll know that my two favourite hobbies which I’m most passionate about are aeroplanes and wine. Not always in that order, and never enjoyed together as the Civil Aviation Authority takes a dim view of such interaction.
But I’ll tell you a secret …I don’t actually have a favourite bottle of wine, nor do I have any silly rules like ‘no bottle under £20’ or some such. I admit that I do subscribe to Decanter, read Jancis Robinson online, and subscribe to more wine blogs and Twitter feeds than I care to mention. Whilst data can be very useful, you always run the risk of ‘analysis paralysis’ and, at the end of the day …much of what is written about wine is frankly someone’s subjective opinion.
No, I firmly believe that wine should be had for enjoyment …and I’ve tasted exceptional wine at £5 as well as wine costing much more which I wouldn’t clean Mrs. PL’s motor engine with. Equally, as each one of us has an idea of the tastes we like and don’t like …who am I to tell someone else whether a bottle is good or not? All I can do is tell you if I like it, although this does introduce the small problem of what to serve at dinner parties or when Mrs. PL and I are sharing a bottle.
So, what to do? I do have a little formula in my head that I use which takes things into account when I choose a bottle …why are we drinking this, is it a celebration or a weekday? …how much does it cost, and is that a fair price? …what kind of food are we eating, or are we not eating until later? …and so on. I want to get on to the crux of this post, but at the bottom of this post there are a few wines which make the PL Wine List.
What has this got to do with data storage and protection?
I’ll tell you another secret …contrary to what some might believe …including a few of our vendors …I don’t have a ‘favourite’ vendor or product any more than I have a favourite bottle of wine. Without getting too Eddie Haskell about this, what is truly important to me …and I know I am far from alone in this within Computacenter …are our customers and how our solutions can help them remain competitive in their respective markets in the midst of a difficult economy.
Great, fantastic, huzzah. But so what. Isn’t that, you know …your job? Indeed it is, but just as it can be difficult to select a wine for an occasion where it will be shared with others …how do we select a solution for a customer in a selective and demonstrably valuable way?
Some customers work directly with vendors and often use Gartner Magic Quadrants as a way to select their preferred solution. Nothing wrong with that, but just as some winemakers and wineries are now openly criticising scoring systems they see as subjective scoring techniques such as the Robert Parker 100 Point Scale …so too are some vendors criticising the Gartner Magic Quadrants claiming the research methodologies are something less than scientific. Indeed, a vendor recently brought a suit against Gartner claiming exactly this, with the suit having been initially thrown out but likely to be appealed.
Now, this post isn’t about criticising or having a go at Gartner or their Magic Quadrants …indeed, I applaud Gartner for being very open and transparent regarding their research techniques leaving folks to make up their minds for themselves.
That said, I believe research provided by companies such as Gartner to be but one part of the solution equation.
In an effort to inject more science into a solution decision, rather, I would argue that the solution equation should be expressed as [ROI] + [CBA] + [DPB] = CSS.
ROI, or Return on Investment. How does our proposed solution return ROI within our customer’s stated period? How can we leverage the existing infrastructure and investment to improve upon the ROI period?
CBA, or Cost Benefit Analysis. Once the solution has been implemented, how much cost can be removed from our customer’s infrastructure and related budgets? Exactly how will this be achieved (e.g. thin provisioning, data deduplication and/or data compression, storage virtualisation)? What is the CBA not just for one to three years, but for five years from implementation?
DPB, or Disruption to Production Business. What disruption is the recommended solution likely to have on the customer’s production business?
We give each of the above blocks …[ROI], [CBA], and [DPB] each a possible score of 100 such that a perfect solution would give us 300 expressed as CSS, or the Composite Solution Score.
How do we score each of the blocks such that we aren’t scoring subjectively? Well, firstly we ensure that our data consultants retain the highest credentials in the industry …but we then couple their knowledge with a point system derived from IDC Storage v3.0 criteria as well as the Carnegie Mellon Capability Maturity Model.
The findings, CSS, are then presented to the customer in either a ‘leader table’ format or as an executive review comparative matrix based upon the vendor solutions the customer informed us they were most interested in. In addition, the findings often form the basis on which we can offer to underwrite / gainshare the proposed cost savings for up to and including five years from implementation.
How do we do that, exactly? Well, I can certainly provide you some samples but it does very much remain Computacenter intellectual property …and it probably doesn’t hurt to have a Practice Leader for Data Storage & Protection who studied neuroscience and Technology Leader for Data Consultants in Bill McGloin who studied applied mathematics.
Does it always work? Yes …and no. Just as people have reasons for liking or disliking different wines, so too customers will have reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with our findings.
But I believe this is just about the fairest way I know to present a proposed solution in an agnostic way …and, at the very least, absolutely articulates our value to a customer as a true service and solution provider.
As always, if you would like further assistance in taking this journey please don’t hesitate to contact me.
Have a great weekend,
PL Winter 2009/10 Wine List
If you like champagne as a pre-dinner drink or to celebrate, you won’t go far wrong with Heidseck Monopole Gold Top vintage 2004. Always a quality drop, but at £19.99 from the normal £40 …or even £18.99 if you are near a Budgens …this is a steal!
If you are looking for something more ‘unique’ in the champers department, why not try Nyetimber? Produced in Sussex, which has geographical features identical to the champagne region, this the the tipple good enough for Her Majesty to serve at the Royal Garden Parties.
I’m a huge fan of pinot noir from New Zealand, and you won’t go wrong with the bottle which won the International Wine Challenge for Best Red Wine, Wild Earth. At £18 a bottle …and if you hunt around I’ve seen it as low as £13 …how affordable is the world’s best red wine?!
One of the most complex and interesting reds I’ve recently is Lillian Shiraz Mataro 2005. At £11.75 a bottle, I challenge you to blind taste it and tell me it doesn’t taste about three times more expensive. I’m stocking up on this one!
Finally, to round out the reds I give you Château Méaume ‘Château Matured’ 2003 Bordeaux Supérieur. A bit of a mouthful for a wine costing a very affordable £8.99, yet if you open it 45 minutes before dinner I guarantee your guests will think you spent a whole lot more than that!